A decidedly untraditional romantic comedy, "Woo" is more of an "opposites irritate but eventually attract each other" type of story. Featuring an outgoing, fun-loving female lead and her well- mannered "straight man" who comically suffers due to her flamboyant ways, this film succeeds mainly due to the winning performances from those two leads.
Instead of the standard plot commonly found in romantic comedies where the main characters initially don't like each other, then get together, but break up and finally get together again, this movie runs full speed ahead playing off the notion that true opposites do indeed attract one another. Focusing almost entirely on the friction generated between the two characters' contrasting lifestyles, the film does manage to deliver quite a few laughs early in the story before losing most of its comic steam later on.
Those early laughs come from Tim's obvious social insecurity and his awkwardness during the early stages of his date with Woo. His preparations for her arrival are humorous, and a scene where he accidentally sets a roll of toilet paper on fire after she arrives is quite funny. In fact it's Davidson's dumbfounded reactions to Woo's attempts at shaking up his stilted lifestyle, and the repercussions that follow, that provide most of the film's better moments.
Other humor originates from his three friends who continuously show up during his date and represent the more chauvinistic side of men's treatment toward women. Of course all of that leads up to one's comeuppance as he mistakes a bar full of friendly transvestites as hitting his own private sexual jackpot. The humor then, however, dips below the belt as this character learns the truth and then disgustedly pulls a pair of women's underwear from his jacket and smells his fingers. While some at our screening found this funny, whether you do depends on your tolerance of sophomoric humor.
Director Daisy V.S. Mayer ("Party Girl") and screenwriter David C. Johnson ("D.R.O.P. Squad") often do resort to such "low ball" attempts at humor and other odd moments that unfortunately prevent the film from being a really good romantic comedy. Occasionally sped up film, goofing sound effects, and scenes such as a woman partially dressed in chicken feathers and sexually strutting around like such a fowl belittle most of the film's efforts. It's obvious, though, that Mayer intends to play this film against the normal conventions of the genre, and that's evident in moments such as when Billy Dee Williams shows up as Tim's romantic conscience.
Jada Pinkett Smith ("Scream 2," "The Nutty Professor") is delightful in her role and brings a revved up charm to her character. Easily portraying the fun loving, well known and extremely confident woman, Jada is fun to watch whenever she's on screen. Tommy Davidson ("Booty Call," TV's "In Living Color") is good as the comic straight man whose ultra-steady life is disrupted by Woo's flamboyant nature. The only problem is that his character — as written — doesn't always remain congruous to his initial conduct. Perhaps that's the director suggesting that all men are "pigs" at heart, but it somewhat diminishes the fun had at the expense of his character.
Overall, the film offers a large range of humorous moments for a wide variety of comedic appetites, so it should partially please many moviegoers as long as they're not offended by the picture's intentionally played stereotypes. The main problem, however, is that by offering so many types of humor -- especially in the low common denominator arena -- the film never satiates one's appetite for a general romantic comedy unless you aren't that discerning about what you're "fed" cinematically.
Even so, the winning and charming performances from Smith and Davidson mostly make up for any such shortcomings. Although not a traditional romantic comedy and certainly not even approaching the status of being a classic in that genre, the film offers some fun moments and clearly pleased our preview audience. We give "Woo" a 6 out of 10.