[Screen It]
    

 

"SHREK"
(2001) (voices of Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy) (PG)

If you've come from our parental review of this film and wish to return to it, simply click on your browser's BACK button.
Otherwise, use the following link to read our complete Parental Review of this film.

QUICK TAKE:
Comedy/Adventure: Accompanied by an unwelcome and garrulous donkey, an ornery ogre reluctantly sets out to retrieve a cursed princess so that a prince will remove the fairy tale characters that were banished to his swamp home.
PLOT:
In a far-off, fairy tale land, Shrek (voice of MIKE MYERS) is a large and ornery, but benevolent ogre who simply wants to be left alone in his swamp-based home. Unfortunately, the actions of Lord Farquaad (voice of JOHN LITHGOW), a diminutive but large-headed prince, have all but squandered Shrek's solitude. For starters, he's banished the land's many fairy tale characters, such as the three blind mice and Snow White and the seven dwarves, into Shrek's swamp.

To make matter worse, Shrek's new "friend" is a hyperactive and wisecracking Donkey (voice of EDDIE MURPHY) who not only can speak, but also won't shut up or leave him alone. Irked by this turn of events, Shrek goes to see Farquaad to set matters straight. The prince, however, agrees to the ogre's demands only if he'll travel to a far-off castle, rescue a princess imprisoned on the top floor that's protected by a fire-breathing dragon, and return her to him to be his bride.

Accompanied by the Donkey, Shrek reluctantly begins his journey to retrieve Fiona (voice of CAMERON DIAZ), a princess who turns out to be cursed with a spell that can only be broken by love's first kiss. As they make their way to the castle where they encounter the dragon and then head back to Farquaad's kingdom, Shrek, the Donkey and Fiona learn unexpected things about themselves, each other and the true nature of beauty.

OUR TAKE: 8 out of 10
It seems that every day another animal or plant life is put on the endangered species list thanks mostly to man's encroachment on their habitat or the devastating effect of chemical runoff, pollution or other byproducts of modern civilization.

Although obviously not as severe in concept or end result, certain moviegoing jobs appear certain to be added to the cinematic endangered list and run the risk of becoming extinct altogether. While there's been little in Hollywood's past to elicit such concern - beyond the advent of sound that put various organists and some silent film stars out of business - the introduction of computers in the world of movies seems destined to eliminate many jobs, while creating a disparagingly disproportionate replacement of new ones.

The first to feel the effect were those in the visual effects fields, such as the model builders, matte painters and makeup technicians and artists. Filmmakers quickly learned that computers could give them faster, cheaper and more varied results than the "real thing."

With the advent of Pixar and its terrific computer-animated shorts and then feature films such as "A Bug's Life" and the "Toy Story" movies, traditional hand drawn animated work would seem to be the next added to the endangered list. That's particularly evident from such graphics becoming more commonplace in Disney and other studios' animated efforts and due to the three-dimensional abilities of computers that offer more depth to an animated film's look than what hand drawn work can provide.

With the release of "Shrek" and what I've seen so far of clips from "Final Fantasy," however, something far greater than any of those fields is in danger and that's the human actors and actresses themselves. One can imagine directors, producers and studio heads happily embracing computer-generated performers as they'd eliminate temperamental behavior, $20 million salaries and various human flubs and miscues, all of which drive up production costs.

Of course, moviemakers would still need vocal performances and the all important talent and imagination that only human writers can muster, but all of that also seems inevitably doomed as computers become faster and more capable of replacing or at least mimicking various human qualities and capabilities.

That said, if the delightful and witty "Shrek" is any indication of the progressive shape of things to come in the cinema regarding such matters, we're off to a promising start. Not surprisingly, the visual effects - courtesy of Visual Effects Supervisor Ken Bielenberg and Supervising Animator Raman Hui (both of whom worked on "Antz") and their animation team -- are what will be immediately noticed, and are nothing short of outstanding and an amazing advancement from what's previously been offered in such films.

While few of the characters - save the Princess - even attempt to look completely realistic, certain elements of them - their faces, flowing hair and general body movement for example, are startling to behold. The same holds true for the incredibly intricate and highly detailed world in which they exist. Simply put, and at least until the next film comes along to better it, this will be the most glorious piece of computer-generated eye candy you've ever seen on the big screen.

What makes the film - like most of its computer-generated cousins - so enjoyable and entertaining, however, is the basic story, the characters existing within it, and the terrific vocal performances from a talented and well-known cast. It's a testament to the collective efforts of all involved that the effects don't overshadow the overall film, but instead perfectly complement and enhance the tale that's to be told.

Taking the fairy tale route, the story - directed by Andrew Adamson (a former visual effects supervisor) and Vicky Jenson (a former art director and production designer) and penned by screenwriters Ted Elliot & Terry Rossio ("The Mask of Zorro," "Aladdin"), Joe Stillman ("Joseph: King of Dreams," "Beavis & Butthead Do America") & Roger S.H. Schulman ("Balto," "The Jungle Book II") who've adapted William Steig's book - is actually quite simple in structure, but nevertheless very effective and entertaining for viewers of all ages.

Yet, for its basic simplicity, the film works on various levels. Its message about inner beauty flows naturally from the main story without seeming contrived or preachy. Humor stems from all sorts of origins, with some of the most barbed but funny material not so subtly taking humorous potshots at animation rival Disney (one of DreamWorks SKG's head honchos, Jeffrey Katzenberg, reportedly had a bad experience working for the Mouse House where he was denied a promotion and thus left).

Some such material is obvious while other bits are more obscure, but most everyone will get at least some of the jokes that are occasionally delivered in machinegun fashion. While such humor is what makes the film entertaining and often hilarious when not otherwise generally amusing, it's the fabulous cast of characters the filmmakers have envisioned, crafted and voiced that makes it nothing short of altogether engaging.

The title character - voiced by Mike Myers (the "Wayne's World" and "Austin Powers" films) in a more subdued and thus enjoyable Scottish type accent that he often employs - is a terrific animated film creation. Funny yet flawed and far more human than the vast majority of characters created by flesh and blood performers, Shrek could easily become a favorite among kids and a franchise for DreamWorks.

It's Eddie Murphy (the "Dr. Dolittle" and "Nutty Professor" films), however, who steals the show and gets most of the film's funniest bits as a wisecracking, jive-talking donkey who rattles off his lines ten times faster than the film's already speedy humor is delivered. For those who enjoyed Murphy's vocal work in "Mulan," you haven't seen - or heard - anything yet.

Rounding out the main characters is Cameron Diaz ("Charlie's Angels," "Being John Malkovich") as the beautiful princess with a curse-based secret and John Lithgow ("Terms of Endearment," TV's "3rd Rock From the Sun") as the nefarious prince who wants her as his bride, and both performers deliver great vocal performances. Given few or no lines to speak, various other characters are also fun to behold, from the many fairy tale characters to a terrific fire-breathing dragon (that's reminiscent of what Warner Bros. used to do in their cartoons) and one of the film's best bits, a "tortured" gingerbread man who delivers the film's funniest line.

Overall, this is an effort that deserves to be lumped in with the modern day classics of animation. Although its computer-generated effects shouldn't worry any real performers about losing their jobs just yet and doesn't answer the question of whether fans will one day idolize computerized stars like their real counterparts, if this is any indication of what's yet to come, we wholeheartedly look forward to the continued future of computer-animated movies. The fabulously entertaining and highly enjoyable "Shrek" rates as an 8 out of 10.




Reviewed April 5, 2001 / Posted May 18, 2001


If You're Ready to Find Out Exactly What's in the Movies Your Kids
are Watching, Click the Add to Cart button below and
join the Screen It family for just $7.95/month or $47/year

[Add to Cart]


Privacy Statement and Terms of Use and Disclaimer
By entering this site you acknowledge to having read and agreed to the above conditions.

All Rights Reserved,
©1996-2017 Screen It, Inc.